6week

this week's key point>>
People often interact with media technologies as though the technologies were people.
I learned about related points(ethics, aesthetics & teleology, design) and questions.
Also, We studied history of HCI (from a tool-building perspective).

history of HCI as tools: people>>Vannevar Bush: memexJ.C.R. Licklider: computer networking, agentsIvan Sutherland: sketchpadDoug Engelbart: mouse, GUI, word processing, etc.Ted Nelson: hypertextAlan Kay: object-oriented programming, laptops, ...
history of HCI as tools: systems>>Memex: 1945 (concept)Sketchpad 1963NLS (oNLine System) - 1963-68Xerox Alto 1972, Xerox Star 1981Apple Lisa 1983, Mac 1984, NeXT 1988Macintosh Powerbook 1991WWW ~1994
history of HCI as tools: funding>>Military: Navy, Air Force, ARPA, DARPAUniversities: MIT, Stanford, CMU, UCGovernment: National Science Foundation 1950-now Companies: Xerox PARC: 1970-now, Apple – NeXTsimple example..using webcam

question for today>>what problem does Weizenbaum’s ELIZA system address or solve?the artificial intelligence answer: it does (or does not) behave like a human and is therefore successful (or not successful)
the ethnomethodology answer: it is taken to be a like a person in a conversation and thus simply works like most other technologies in a social situation
(※definition of the ethnomethodology>> Ethnomethodology simply means the study of the ways in which people make sense of their social world. Ethnomethodology is a fairly recent sociological perspective, founded by the American sociologist Harold Garfinkel in the early 1960s. The main ideas behind it are set out in his book "Studies in Ethnomethodology" (1967).)

5week

이 요약은 사용할 수 없습니다. 이 글을 보려면 여기를 클릭하세요.

4week

*This week class keypoint: New media technologies usually reinforce existing social networks or even work to isolata people. and they simultaneously challenge existing social, political and economic relationships.This week keypoint is link to 'People make media and then media make people.' nowaday a number of media are exist. and this influence our social network. mainly social network is studied interdisciplinary by social scientists. but physicists and mathematicians contributed understanding of social networks too. the understand of social network is can expecting pattern and quick reaction. Social network is expressed by picture,graphy and chart. and one interesting theory Mark Granovetter, “The Strength of Weak Ties”is Sometimes weak relationship are more valuable than strong relationship. it is interesting and confusing.definition some relationship. example, 'epuivalence' is people that have same social network. and 'centrality' is people that know almost people. that link central position. and 'bridges' is people that link separated group. this is function for social capital. *COMMENTThis week class have a character of social science. nowaday the influence of internet to rerationship is wonderful. Ordinary I think network and rerationship. that's so complicate. thus understanding of socialnetwork always have variables.